PeTA: Only environmentally-conscious when it suits their agenda?
Friday, April 25th, 2008If you’ve ever seen animal rights groups carrying on, you’ve probably run into their claim that veganism is better for the environment and economy. Other research suggests that this ain’t necessarily so.
Critical thinking shows that animal rights bigwigs only seem to care about the environment as far as it suits their purpose. PeTA recently endorsed eating in-vitro meat. They’ve long abhorred leather in favor of vinyl and synthetics.
Hullo? Are they that clueless about the things that go into making such products? Are they not aware that in vitro meats would be created by machinery guzzling fossil fuels and oil instead of grazing on natural grass powered by the sun? Are they not aware that vinyl and fossil fuels come from the oil drilled from the ground which has its own price in blood and destructive impact on the environment?
It seems these people don’t care as long as they can’t actually see the death and destruction being caused or the remains of the animals that died for their “cruelty-free” products. I don’t know about you, but I’ll stick with meat and leather, both of which are superior products. Leather lasts longer than any synthetic you can chuck up, it has better insulation properties, and it wasn’t related to an oil spill in the ocean. And meat… well, we know that the historical evidence does not fit the extravagant claims they make about it being dangerous to your health.