Archive for May, 2008

Where is your Least Harm Principle now?

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

If you hate killing animals, gardening is not for you. That is, unless insects and isopods aren’t animals. (You speciesist/sizist, you!)

After a few square feet and one hour in the garden, I sent over three hundred garden pests to their doom. A few feet. One hour. Over three hundred pests.

Then I went out and killed a few hundred more.

Now which do you suppose has a higher death toll attached – a year’s worth of beans or a year’s worth of free-range meat?

The dangers of digital cameras

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

Studies have linked digital cameras to clogged hard drives. It’s a known fact that owning a digital camera enables you to make a fool of yourself in ways you never thought possible. And older models of digital cameras could suck the money out of your pockets by requiring obscure and expensive batteries.

Having found myself with a clogged harddrive, I decided to do the sensible thing and start deleting some of my crappier photos. Along the way I noticed a disturbing trend: self-portraits. Lots and lots of self-portraits. Only .5% of them are actually good self-portraits. Most of them either blurry, poorly-lit, taken at a horrific angle, or I had some stupid expression that made me look ill.

What was I thinking?!

Why did I think I needed to take 439,832 pictures of myself? Do I have some kind of deep-seated security issues that can only be satiated by taking self-portraits? Why did I ever think these horrible photos merited anything but immediate deletion? Did I actually think I looked good posing like that? And who did I think would even want to see these?!

There are a few that I’m not embarrassed to admit exist, and this is one of them:

My nose.

I still don’t know what I was thinking with that one.

Please, get your forum terminology straight already.

Friday, May 16th, 2008

Because there’s nothing that annoys me quite like borked-up forum terminology, I’m going to lay it out.

THREAD: This is what you read posts and post in. Depending on where you go you might find thread titles like “Which is better – InuYasha or Naruto?” or “What does the avatar above you taste like?”

BOARD: This is what contains threads. Many forums contain boards with titles like “General Discussion,” “Roleplaying,” and “Angry Rants.”

FORUM: This is the whole enchilada containing the threads and the boards.

Still confused? This is a forum. This is a board. This is a thread.

Think being thin will protect you from diabetes? Think again.

Friday, May 2nd, 2008

Jeff O’Connell relates his tale: his once-healthy and athletic father, now emaciated, amputated, and dying of diabetes-related complications in the hospital, his own diagnosis of reactive hypoglycemia, and what he’s doing to keep himself from suffering his father’s fate.

In February 2008, I arrive at a nursing home in the San Fernando Valley to visit the man in that photograph, a man I’ve neither seen nor spoken to in 20 years. Entering his room, I barely recognize the gaunt face. Where his right thigh should be sits a corduroy pant leg, gathered up and bobby-pinned. The spindly arm he extends to greet me is splotched with blood bursts. Once 6’3” and 215 pounds, he’s now a cadaverous-looking 145. The only cheerful note in the room is a balloon tied to the metal bed frame. His 73rd birthday was last week, apparently. It’s a detail I had long since forgotten.

And later in the article…

I wouldn’t be let off that easily, though. A week later I visited my own doctor, who had called me in to review blood work done several weeks earlier for a routine physical. He scanned my numbers and looked up. “Does diabetes run in your family?”

Bad medical news didn’t shock me. Both of my parents survived cancer, and my mother has epilepsy. But I write for Men’s Health. I’ve cowritten a book on sports nutrition. I’ve been the occasional butt of skinny-guy wisecracks in school. Diabetes? Isn’t that for grandmothers in wheelchairs?

The doctor slid the lab report in front of me and began explaining the jumble of numbers. One stood out: 116, which quantified the amount of glucose floating in my bloodstream after a 12-hour fast. Under 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) is good; anything above 126 is diabetes. That meant I was well into prediabetes, a term sugarcoated in more ways than one, since most men eventually lose the prefix.

And he notes the absurdity of that infamous quack-pack, the ADA:

What’s more, the typical advice offered makes you wonder if Americans are being given an antidote against or a prescription for the disease. For example, everyone from my doctor to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) tells people with impaired blood sugar, or prediabetes, to make carbohydrate-rich foods such as breads and grains the foundation of their diets. This despite a growing body of evidence that points to carb reduction as the best anti-diabetes strategy. After all, there’s another term for people who are insulin resistant: glucose intolerant. Meaning they don’t respond well to carbohydrates. The higher the dose of carbs, the more problems those carbs cause.

This year, after decades of resistance, the ADA finally acknowledged low-carb dieting as a legitimate response to diabetes. Which goes to show that if you wait for a health organization to issue a position paper before attacking the disease, you may end up reading that paper from a hospital bed.

So what is Jeff O’Connell doing to successfully control his pre-diabetes? Low-carb. Specifically, Atkins.

Read The Deadly Truth About Diabetes: The Thin Man’s Diabetes.